PickGuru, you raise an excellent point, one that I’ve been asking for some time now: just what exactly is “rock and roll,” anyway? At the very least, I think it should be called the Rock and Soul Hall of Fame, which leads me to . . .
>>I am fine with blues, soul and R&B music belonging due to much of the music having rock elements.
Isn’t that putting the cart before the horse? Blues began before rock was a twinkle in anyone’s eye; or as the Muddy Waters song put it, “The Blues Had a Baby and They Called It Rock and Roll.” R&B, arising roughly in the 1940s, is the most direct antecedent to rock, if only because so many R&B singers (LaVern Baker, Big Joe Turner, et al) crossed over into early rock and roll with little effort; just check the similarities between Bill Haley’s version of “Shake, Rattle, and Roll” and Turner’s--is Haley’s “rock” because he was white and Turner’s “R&B” because he was black? They both sound like “rock” to me. And soul is coterminous with rock: Both began at around the same time and have been developing concurrently ever since. Hence, “rock and soul.”
To me, this is all Western popular music of the Rock Era, which began in the 1950s. And to borrow from Del Shannon, rock is a “little town flirt”--it'll borrow from any musical form, style, or genre, to the point which we have a plethora of hyphenates (e.g., acid-house, trip-hop, skate-punk, funk-metal, etc.) describing genres, sub-genres, sub-sub-genres, seemingly ad infinitum.
So, to begin to discriminate at this point is ridiculous, such as excluding rap. Along with heavy metal, hip-hop is the biggest musical style on the planet and has been for some time. Rap is popular from Berlin to Beirut to Bangalore to Bangkok, and as an indigenous American style, as is rock, it should be recognized. (By the way, Run-DMC incorporated heavy-metal guitar into “Rock Box” two years before “Walk This Way.”)
I agree that the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame shot itself in the foot first with its potentially restrictive name and second with its reluctance to define what it considers to be “rock and roll.” (I suppose, like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s recognition of pornography, the Hall will “know it when it sees it.”) These two failings only exacerbate disagreements over which artists are “Hall-worthy”--and our own restrictive tastes and biases don’t help, either.